Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id LAA07721 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 11:10:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA152344919; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 08:08:39 -0700
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 08:08:39 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <17AC6F4BFB@CALUMET.YORKU.CA>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: ZHUNT@Calumet.Yorku.Ca
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: Q: Storb light
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status: A
>At 14:24 24-04-96 -0400, Zoltan wrote: >I've been thinking of
> >doing a simple enclosure with a light&flare inside, but then I get into
> >problems with having the flare show though the glass, but not in front of
> >any other objects (i.e. some steel beams)
>
> My $0.05:
>
> Write down the framenumbers in which other objects should cover the
>lensflare. Render your animation with lensflare shining through everything.
>Render only the frames of which you've written down the numbers, with the
>lensflare disappearing behind objects (remove your glass casing). I think
>lensflares take more than one frame to disappear, so check it out. This
>should work.
Oh boy, thanks, but this involved a lot of beam-work and a lot of lights, so